Archive for Internet

I’m using Facebook just like another 62 million people. It’s really a nice technology and a good way to get in touch with your friends and people you haven’t seen for quite a while, but I use it with great care. Facebook is a huge personal information database, nothing else. Of course there’s a privacy agreement you accept with Facebook meaning they can’t disclose your personal details and informations, but it’s not that rock solid:

“Facebook may use information in your profile without identifying you as an individual to third parties. We do this for purposes such as aggregating how many people in a network like a band or movie and personalizing advertisements and promotions so that we can provide you Facebook. We believe this benefits you. You can know more about the world around you and, where there are advertisements, they’re more likely to be interesting to you. For example, if you put a favorite movie in your profile, we might serve you an advertisement highlighting a screening of a similar one in your town. But we don’t tell the movie company who you are.”

“We may use information about you that we collect from other sources, including but not limited to newspapers and Internet sources such as blogs, instant messaging services, Facebook Platform developers and other users of Facebook, to supplement your profile. Where such information is used, we generally allow you to specify in your privacy settings that you do not want this to be done or to take other actions that limit the connection of this information to your profile (e.g., removing photo tag links).”

“We do not provide contact information to third party marketers without your permission. We share your information with third parties only in limited circumstances where we believe such sharing is 1) reasonably necessary to offer the service, 2) legally required or, 3) permitted by you.”

As you can see, the Facebook policy you accept is opened to personal information sharing. We can read that Facebook don’t provide contact details to third party marketers without your permission, but the reality is that often the default options are set to allow the sharing of your profile’s details. Most people don’t know they have to remove the option in their profile manually. You also agree to receive targeted Ads corresponding to your profile.

One thing I don’t like about the term of service agreement is that particular sentence:

“We share your information with third parties only in limited circumstances where we believe such sharing is 1) reasonably necessary to offer the service [...]“

What’s the notion of “reasonably necessary? reasonably can be quite questionable and my notion of what’s reasonable ain’t probably the same as Facebook.

The whole lesson to learn about this Facebook personal information sharing is that most people profiles are gold mines for advertisers and governments. It’s a personal information database people are creating themselves having fun! I bet there’s a lot of people ready to pay for that database. Imagine: on most profiles we find pictures, what you like (movies, drinks, interests, music, etc.), your friends, your age, sex, date of birth, marital status, political views, school attending, work place and there’s many more. I can think of million and million of companies or even governments that would be more than happy to get that valuable database. Even though Facebook is not disclosing too much information at the moment, we can bet money will do it’s dirty job and make your information available to more and more people. Be careful with what you put on your profile as it can one day get in the hands of people you don’t want.

There’s not just the personal information’s selling that matter: Facebook is a computer software and computer softwares are open to hacking as usual. You never know what can happen with that database.

Continue to use Facebook, it can be really nice but just remember that what you put on there can fall into hands you might not want…

There’s been some sort of hype lately regarding the Web Bots and I’m really surprised there’s almost no information about it available. The Web Bot project was developed in the late 1990s mainly to predict the stock market ups and downs (Web bot and stock markets). How do they do it? It’s really simple in fact and it’s a very nice implementation of what search engines do. Web bots simply crawl the web the same way Google crawls it at regular intervals to catch new and existing web sites and detect relevant keywords. Web Bots do it just a little differently: While search engines are just “indexing” the Web and creating a Web directory, Web bots are looking for trends with the keyword relations they find. It search for keywords “standing out” in a web document but also take in consideration the content preceding and following the keyword. This data is then analyzed by a linguistic tool to determine the meaning if there’s any.

So does it work and are Web Bots reliable? well it’s kind of hit and miss. Sometimes you’ll see things predicted correctly and sometimes not. I think the project is a really good initiative and can lead to great things, but at the moment I’m more under the impression that they interpret the results in the same way we interpret Nostradamus Quatrains. What I mean is that what the Web Bots are getting out of the internet while crawling is not that clear and when an event happen a couple of days later, then we find a way to relate the data.

Being in the computer engineering domain, I think I can see where the Web Bots will succeed and where it will fail. There are fields I believe the Web Bots can predict stuff and there are field they can’t. What are these fields? Well, essentially, anything “man-made” could be predicted in some way and anything man has no control over can’t be predicted. This is for the plain and simple reason that the Web Bots crawl the Internet for data and the Internet is actually man-made. So, the only data that can be collected is data written by people/government/companies,etc. I don’t see how you can predict a natural disaster or anything like that by simply crawling the Web. The only thing you can get by crawling is facts or opinions, nothing else. The only way I can see predicting natural disasters or anything not man related is if the Web Bots actually crawls 3 000 blogs/websites written by specialists of a certain domain and that they are pointing towards a similar conclusion.

What about 2012 (Read my article on 2012) and the Web Bots? As I said, I’m not seeing how a computer can figure out what’s going to happen in 2012 simply by visiting websites published by real people. The more data Web Bots get pointing towards 2012 just means more and more people are publishing stuff about 2012 and the end of the world. Remember, the only thing they can crawl is the internet and what you find on the internet was created by real persons, not God. They will surely get a strong correlation between 2012 and the end of the world; there’s ton of websites talking about it.

So, can Web Bots predict stuff? Yes I believe it can and it’s a really nice piece of technology. I’m pretty sure preventing terrorists attacks can be done using Web Bots and also predicting anything involving human interaction. Remember, it crawls the web, written by humans so it can only predict what humans are able to predict: Just in a shorter time frame! I think it’s easy to fall into the “It can predict everything” stuff, so let’s say it’s a really nice technology which can help us predict things we wouldn’t normally see happening. There’s a lot of future in that field and it has to be pushed a lot more forward. A good project, with good potential, but be careful with what people say it predicted!

Ok, this came out not too long ago and I’m really asking myself a lot of questions about people’s interests…Here’s the list of the 2007 top 10 Yahoo! searches:

1. Britney Spears
2. WWE
3. Paris Hilton
4. Naruto
5. Beyonce
6. Lindsay Lohan
7. RuneScape
8. Fantasy Football
9. Fergie
10. Jessica Alba

So we can all figure out the top searches are celebrities and wrestling. God, there’s so many things on the internet, people don’t have anything more important to search? And WWE being second really surprised me I must say. Much more than all these celebrities! Yahoo is not Google, but still…Being second on Yahoo! is a lot of traffic and a lot of searches. There’s US elections coming soon, a lot of major countries are at war in Irak, there’s just so much thing going on at this time that I can hardly believe these are the top searches but they are.

In fact, now I understand why people are not that much informed of what is going on in this world, they don’t give a damn, Britney Spears is their daily news.

Ok, so you can draw your own conclusions from that list, but mine is that people don’t have a very large frame of interest. But I think we can draw a better conclusion that that, here’s the fastest growing keywords on Google for 2007:

1. iphone
2. webkinz
3. tmz
4. transformers
5. youtube
6. club penguin
7. myspace
8. heroes
9. facebook
10. anna nicole smith

It does make a little bit more sense. There’s still celebrity stuff but there’s a larger frame of interests in that list. Can we say that Google users are on top of the average Yahoo! user? I don’t think so. I just think that the celebrity thing is something Yahoo! is promoting a lot because it brings a lot of traffic and revenue. If you actually go on Yahoo!, you’ll probably see news about a celebrity right on the first page which boost the searches about that subject. On Google, you get a blank search page, so nothing to influence your first search intention. I think in the end they are the same users but Yahoo is promoting a lot for entertainment stuff. It’s some sort of catch-22!

This is a Widget Section

This section is widgetized. If you would like to add content to this section, you may do so by using the Widgets panel from within your WordPress Admin Dashboard. This Widget Section is called "Feature Bottom Right"