Archive for Internet
Web Bot - What is it? Can it predict stuff?
Posted by: | CommentsThere’s been some sort of hype lately regarding the Web Bots and I’m really surprised there’s almost no information about it available. The Web Bot project was developed in the late 1990s mainly to predict the stock market ups and downs (Web bot and stock markets). How do they do it? It’s really simple in fact and it’s a very nice implementation of what search engines do. Web bots simply crawl the web the same way Google crawls it at regular intervals to catch new and existing web sites and detect relevant keywords. Web Bots do it just a little differently: While search engines are just “indexing” the Web and creating a Web directory, Web bots are looking for trends with the keyword relations they find. It search for keywords “standing out” in a web document but also take in consideration the content preceding and following the keyword. This data is then analyzed by a linguistic tool to determine the meaning if there’s any.
So does it work and are Web Bots reliable? well it’s kind of hit and miss. Sometimes you’ll see things predicted correctly and sometimes not. I think the project is a really good initiative and can lead to great things, but at the moment I’m more under the impression that they interpret the results in the same way we interpret Nostradamus Quatrains. What I mean is that what the Web Bots are getting out of the internet while crawling is not that clear and when an event happen a couple of days later, then we find a way to relate the data.
Being in the computer engineering domain, I think I can see where the Web Bots will succeed and where it will fail. There are fields I believe the Web Bots can predict stuff and there are field they can’t. What are these fields? Well, essentially, anything “man-made” could be predicted in some way and anything man has no control over can’t be predicted. This is for the plain and simple reason that the Web Bots crawl the Internet for data and the Internet is actually man-made. So, the only data that can be collected is data written by people/government/companies,etc. I don’t see how you can predict a natural disaster or anything like that by simply crawling the Web. The only thing you can get by crawling is facts or opinions, nothing else. The only way I can see predicting natural disasters or anything not man related is if the Web Bots actually crawls 3 000 blogs/websites written by specialists of a certain domain and that they are pointing towards a similar conclusion.
What about 2012 (Read my article on 2012) and the Web Bots? As I said, I’m not seeing how a computer can figure out what’s going to happen in 2012 simply by visiting websites published by real people. The more data Web Bots get pointing towards 2012 just means more and more people are publishing stuff about 2012 and the end of the world. Remember, the only thing they can crawl is the internet and what you find on the internet was created by real persons, not God. They will surely get a strong correlation between 2012 and the end of the world; there’s ton of websites talking about it.
So, can Web Bots predict stuff? Yes I believe it can and it’s a really nice piece of technology. I’m pretty sure preventing terrorists attacks can be done using Web Bots and also predicting anything involving human interaction. Remember, it crawls the web, written by humans so it can only predict what humans are able to predict: Just in a shorter time frame! I think it’s easy to fall into the “It can predict everything” stuff, so let’s say it’s a really nice technology which can help us predict things we wouldn’t normally see happening. There’s a lot of future in that field and it has to be pushed a lot more forward. A good project, with good potential, but be careful with what people say it predicted!
Top 10 Yahoo! searches for 2007…Why am I surprised?
Posted by: | CommentsOk, this came out not too long ago and I’m really asking myself a lot of questions about people’s interests…Here’s the list of the 2007 top 10 Yahoo! searches:
1. Britney Spears
2. WWE
3. Paris Hilton
4. Naruto
5. Beyonce
6. Lindsay Lohan
7. RuneScape
8. Fantasy Football
9. Fergie
10. Jessica Alba
So we can all figure out the top searches are celebrities and wrestling. God, there’s so many things on the internet, people don’t have anything more important to search? And WWE being second really surprised me I must say. Much more than all these celebrities! Yahoo is not Google, but still…Being second on Yahoo! is a lot of traffic and a lot of searches. There’s US elections coming soon, a lot of major countries are at war in Irak, there’s just so much thing going on at this time that I can hardly believe these are the top searches but they are.
In fact, now I understand why people are not that much informed of what is going on in this world, they don’t give a damn, Britney Spears is their daily news.
Ok, so you can draw your own conclusions from that list, but mine is that people don’t have a very large frame of interest. But I think we can draw a better conclusion that that, here’s the fastest growing keywords on Google for 2007:
1. iphone
2. webkinz
3. tmz
4. transformers
5. youtube
6. club penguin
7. myspace
8. heroes
9. facebook
10. anna nicole smith
It does make a little bit more sense. There’s still celebrity stuff but there’s a larger frame of interests in that list. Can we say that Google users are on top of the average Yahoo! user? I don’t think so. I just think that the celebrity thing is something Yahoo! is promoting a lot because it brings a lot of traffic and revenue. If you actually go on Yahoo!, you’ll probably see news about a celebrity right on the first page which boost the searches about that subject. On Google, you get a blank search page, so nothing to influence your first search intention. I think in the end they are the same users but Yahoo is promoting a lot for entertainment stuff. It’s some sort of catch-22!

