Archive for conspiracy
I posted a little something a couple of days (weeks?) ago about the 2012 Olympics and how its being used to spread the 2012 doomsday theory. Now, a new theory has surfaced about the Olympics’ mascots and it is once again totally ridiculous. The theory tries to link China’s earthquake disaster and other recent catastrophes with the Olympics mascots. smh.com.au published an article about it and here’s the theory:
The five Olympic mascots are Jingjing, Huanhuan, Yingying, Nini and Beibei. Jingjing, a panda, is the animal most closely associated with Sichuan province where the earthquake struck.
Huanhuan, a cartoon character with flame-red hair, is being linked by bloggers to the Olympic torch that has been dogged by anti-China protests on its round-the-world tour.
Yingying, an antelope, is an animal confined to the borders of Tibet, which has been the scene of riots and the cause of international protests against China, the bloggers say.
Nini, represented by a kite, is being viewed as a reference to the “kite city” of Weifang, in Shandong, where there was a deadly train crash last month.
That leaves only Beibei, represented by a sturgeon fish, which online doomsayers suggest could indicate a looming disaster in the Yangtze River, the only place where sturgeon is found.
Read the full article at smh if you want a little more!
The last time I posted a video about 9/11 conspiracy theory, it brought a lot of controversy among DCS readers and I must admit I liked it. So I’m going with one more well made 9/11 video. This is a 20 minutes video supporting the 9/11 conspiracy theory and I’m not commenting on it, you make your own opinion on that one. I just enjoy getting your opinions on this interesting subject and 9/11 always bring interesting conversations.
So here’s the video:
Enjoy and leave your comments!
Just a quick article to let you know about this website: The Orion Correlation. Thanks to Alex, a DCS reader, for discovering that website. It is a “fake conspiracy” website and really a nice read. It basically makes fun at all those web 0.1 conspiracy websites I’ve been talking about since DCS exists. The sad part is that the false arguments and proofs on the website aren’t really far from the “proofs” used by serious conspiracy websites. Anyway, it’s a good and entertaining read and it’s not too long to go through. Have a look!
Still while browsing today I came across this interesting post:
If you can adequately outline what this program does, please email me, X@X.com. The entire program runs 41 single spaced pages, too large for here, but I’ll gladly upload entirety to all takers. I believe it is evidence of illegal FBI data harvesting from ALL Windows based computers as this log was generated from a computer never on the internet. Notice it also mentions ‘CIA section’. I’d also guess this is part of the US government TIA program, outlawed by Congress but nevertheless initiated by the current bunch of rats at the helm….let me know.
REGFIX: Batch file processing initiated.
REGFIX: Updating arbitrators…
REGFIX: Deleting original values…
…
REGFIX: Replace %PNP0C02% … “*PNP0C0210″
REGFIX: Replace %PNP0C02% … “*PNP0C0211″
REGFIX: Importing new values…
REGFIX: Looking for device file… “80861229.REG”
REGFIX: Looking for device file… “80867124.REG”
REGFIX: Looking for device file… “80867125.REG”
REGFIX: Looking for device file… “80862418.REG”
REGFIX: Looking for device file… “80862410.REG”
REGFIX: Batch file processing completed.
******************************************************
FBI StartUp at ->Wed Sep 05 23:46:26 2001<- aka ->999751586
This should be the first start of FBI - 1.20.14
SM v1.04.2
Log started on Wed Sep 05 23:46:26 2001
[23:46:26.600] attempting to merge autotest.ini file defined as ->A:AUTOTEST.INI
[23:46:26.660] FBI is starting in Retail mode
[23:46:26.660] Loading Internal FBI Toolbox functions
[23:46:26.660] LoadFBIInt15 - FBIInt15.VxD load Successful
[23:46:26.710] LoadFBIKB_95 - FBIKB_95.VxD load Successful
[23:46:26.710] OpenFBIKB_95() - FBIKB_95.VxD driver loaded->CMD14 ->WriteUIAErrorCode
In that situation, FBI stands for File Based Installer and is packaged on HP computers. I believe that’s mostly how 99% of conspiracy theories get started. Somebody who doesn’t have a single clue what he’s talking about think everyone is watching him just because FBI appears on a couple of lines of code on his computer.
Sure, FBI would clearly name their programs running on your computer “FBI”. They are that stupid.
Where is this world going…
Don’t worry too much, Oxygen is good for you. It’s just that I’ve read a post today on a forum and it goes like this:
PURE AIR THEY TELL YOU IS GOOD FOR
DON’TBREATH IT IN
THE FACT IS SCIENTIFICALLY PROVEN THAT CARBON IS BETTER FOR YOU THAN OXYGEN
In a new ground breaking discovery SCIENTIST FOR THE FREEDOM OF MAN have found that we have all been conned into breathing oxygen from birth, this didn’t used to be the case.
It is the master plan of the globalists through their modern science dillusions , they setup hospital care when the babies are born they take them and flood them with oxygen through a mask and rinse out THE NATURAL BREATHING OF NATURAL MAN AND REPLACE ALL THE CARBON MONOXIDE WITH A POISON WE KNOW AS OXYGEN
I KNOW THIS SOUNDS FAR FETCHED BUT ITS LIKE GETTING SOMEONE HOOKED ON SMOKING- EVEN THOUGH THAT IS FAR SAFER.
THEY HAVE SETUP MASSIVE TANKS IN OUTER SPACE AND HAVE BEEN FLOODING OUR ATMOSPHERE WITH THIS POISONOUS SUBSTANCE - OXYGEN SINCE 1827.
Do I really need to comment on that? Does that dude know carbon monoxide will kill you if you breath too much?
This is really one of the funniest story I’ve heard recently. Why would someone get you addicted to Oxygen instead of carbon monoxide? It’s not like we pay for Oxygen…
There really is a fine line between being open minded and believing everything you hear. One of the most common argument you will hear is: “Open your mind!”, “It’s not because you don’t see it it doesn’t exist”, etc, etc. I’m sure you have more in head but it mostly comes down to that.
So, are we just a bunch of close minded ignorants? What is the limit of being open minded? Where does it start to be ridiculous? I think there’s no way to tell unfortunately. Sometimes you’ll end up being too much open minded which eventually lead to you being wrong because what you believe in doesn’t make sense. Sometimes you’ll end up being too much close minded and you live in your own little world and have a very limited perception of reality.
I think we should use that argument with care because being open minded is not a sign of intelligence or holding the truth. It can be a sign of weakness. On the other side, a well informed open minded person is a strong person with convictions but still opened to other’s opinions.
I think it’s important to clear that open minded thing because especially with conspiracy theorists, that argument is going to be used a lot. Remember, being open minded is not a sign if intelligence, it can even be a sign of weakness. It is important to be open minded as it’s how we share opinions, but it doesn’t hurt to limit your open mindness so you keep a close contact with reality.
As the closing line, stay open minded but don’t abuse the concept: It doesn’t mean believe in everything you hear. It means respect people for what they think. It’s not because someone doesn’t share the same opinions that you’re open minded and he’s not, or the opposite.
Some particularities of conspiracy comments
Posted by: Ben Tremblay | Comments CommentsDaily Common Sense is a well established blog in its field and I published a lot of articles to debunk scams/hoax and conspiracy theories. For that reason, you can imagine I receive hate comments from conspiracists on a daily basis. I must say conspiracists/doomsdayers just confirm how crazy they are for most of them when they comment on blogs. I mean, it’s simply crazy and here’s why.
Usually, when I write a controversial article like the ones on 2012, pole shift or whatever, I receive tons of comments (700+ on 2012 explained) and it’s really nice to read everyone’s opinion on the subject. I don’t expect everyone to agree with me and I don’t want everyone agree with me: I don’t hold the absolute truth and I guess nobody does. In fact, it’s quite interesting when you guys don’t agree with me and I feel like we can have a decent rational discussion. The problem comes when bloody conspiracists/doomsdayers enter the discussion. While they say they are “open minded”, their comments are totally closed to any form of discussion because apparently we just are a bunch of jerks. That is without mentioning that they write every single comment in capital letters. Where does that need to write in capital letters comes from? I don’t know, but it’s really a particularity of doomsdayers. On top of that, they are the only persons who don’t understand they are writing on a damn blog and that the author of the article is approving every single comment going through. I mean, I’m sure most people understand that when they are writing a comment on my blog, attacking me personally with not argument will result in the comment not being approved. You know, common sense. Well, conspiracists/doomsdayers don’t understand simple things like that. Let’s look at a recent comment I received and it’s a good lesson of what not to write:
Ok, first of all, why write everything in capital letters? There’s no way I would approve a comment written in capital letters simply because there’s no reason to do so and it sounds very aggressive. Now there’s at least two good insults in there: “Only people as ignorant as all of you”, “You people make me sad that there are still so many ignorant people in our world good thing this is going to happen that way all you morons will be wiped out”. How do you want me to take such a person seriously? How do you expect to have a decent discussion with such person? I mean, when I said these “open minded” people are totally closed to any form of discussion, that’s what I meant. This comment is also a personal attack to a lot of people, writing on a blog is not like writing on a wall: there’s someone approving every single comment and that person happens to be me. Do you seriously think that by insulting me and every reader of this website and also proving your point with non-logical information will result in the comment being approved? No.
This is just simply amazing. Maybe 98% of the comments I receive are decent comments and I approve them. Unfortunately, the 2% I don’t approve is often from ‘conspiracists/doomsdayers’ and it’s not because they don’t agree with me: It’s because they don’t know how to behave. I’m trying not to be too hard on them, but they don’t help themselves.